- L2 ultramaximizer review software#
- L2 ultramaximizer review plus#
- L2 ultramaximizer review series#
- L2 ultramaximizer review free#
To be dead honest, I'm not sure why that is. In my opinion it is one you need to be more mindful of how you are setting it. It does seem to have more of an aggressive sound than some other limiter, but sometimes that's perfect. (I'm trying to keep things in general here because so much depends on the material.) The majority dB's at mastering are achieved BEFORE the limiter. The end result is a pre-master that arrived at around -12dbrms to -10dbRMS and now is at -10dbRMS to -8dbRMS. So the release for 10 instances is noticeable for you? I can focus on numerous other issues before even thinking about the release on the limiter that rarely kicks in. The L-2 kicks in perhaps 10 instances for a 4:00 pop track. How much gain is your limiter achieving? Honestly, I don't need to worry much about the release because it's not even engaging to cause shaping or anything else very often. With an L2 it either works or it doesn't, you have no flexibility.I think you are proving my point. Depending on the program material you can then shape the limiting behaviour to be sharper and punchier (to use cliche buzz words) or softer and smoother.
Most of the other more modern limiters have much more control over how they deal with transients and how the release shape works. If "better" means something else other than distortion, imaging or color, then please explain.
L2 ultramaximizer review software#
That includes software that is proven to work over time. But ask yourself why ME's use tools that has been around a long time. Marketing will always present something "better." You want the flavor of the month, keep reading shoot-outs in forums. a smooth acoustic project with less transients. Know how it will work with a drum & bass project vs. Much more important is to LEARN your limiter.
L2 ultramaximizer review plus#
Used properly, a good limiter should be transparent, and the L-2 plus many others is that if not pushed. This is why IMO there is no need for so much focus on limiters unless you are using it for effect or color. One pop project was from Bruce Swedien and it was a fairly simple session! Anyone can slap on a limiter at the end of the chain, and get gain, but how will it sound in a controlled environment with higher end speakers? The few times I have used a limiter for majority gain was when the mix already arrived hot, and very little was done at mastering. But remember most ME's get a lot of volume prior to the signal even hitting a limiter. Kclip, Ozone, FFProL are a few that I like better on the Master.What do you mean by "better?"ĭo you mean you can push it further without as much distortion? If so, I think most anyone would agree. There are a bunch of better options out since L2 came out.
L2 ultramaximizer review free#
As a 2nd option I would also suggest the free Limiter No. For a couple dB's RMS it's hard to go wrong with an L2. Just don't expect the L-2 to get you to -8dbRMS without lots of preparation mostly in the mixing stage. There are so many good limiters, it's best to pick one or two and LEARN them. Unfortunately I have heard way too many "mastered" tracks ruined by pushing a limiter too far, multi band compression and limiting, and users with "mastering chains" using way too much stuff.
L2 ultramaximizer review series#
Compression in series is understandable in situations, but now I hear of limiting in series. Experienced mix engineers know this stuff.Įveryone boasts of their "mastering chain" which is sort of a joke, then slapping on a limiter.or even multiple limiters in series near the end.
Know composition and what sounds work together. As a matter of fact.get the dB's before mastering. Your limiter will thank you by putting out just a bit more.and you will be happy. The bad thing is bad artifacts created by limiting that can't be detected without being in a sonicly engineered environment with higher end speakers.
Often times they aren't as transparent, and having a limiter create a "flavor" isn't always a bad thing. The problem as I see it, is developers have created new limiters that can be pushed further. Apologies for sounding like a broken record, but the L-2 is often still one of the best for transparency and a couple dB's. What has happened over the past 15 years with software limiters is a lot of marketing to inexperienced users. Limiting more than a couple of dB is often a bad idea anyway, generally speaking.Yes.